|
Tenure & Academic Excellence, by L. L. Carroll, ACADEME,
Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, May-June
2000, pp. 22-25.
Summarized by J. T. P. Yao, 6/8/00
"Defenders of tenure have traditionally focused on its ability
to protect academic freedom.
To be effective, the work of
the university - the objective discovery and dissemination of knowledge
- must be protected from outside influence. By vesting the faculty
with wide autonomy in pedagogy, research, and institutional governance,
tenure serves this function.
"
"
In the United States, the recent trend toward accountability
- which is the chief characteristic of what I call the 'managerial
university' - appears to result from a period of weakness.
In the managerial university, top-down control, short-term contracts,
and limits on faculty governance effectively curb the scope of faculty
research and the range of faculty professionalism.
One way
in which the managerial university erodes educational quality is
by driving away talented faculty.
"
"Managerial universities weaken tenure and erode faculty autonomy
in several ways: one of the most important is post-tenure review.
Under post-tenure review, faculty members may not feel free to undertake
lengthy projects that cannot be completed in time for a periodic
evaluation. And they may not even be free to choose the venue for
publishing their work, given that some institutions now deem only
certain kinds of scholarly publications acceptable.
"
"Another feature of the managerial university is excessive
use of adjunct or multiyear contracts. A university that views its
faculty as short-term or part-time employees, gives them little
or no say in governance, and subjects them to continuous outcome
checks blunts its competitive edge by encouraging timidity and conformity
among its faculty.
"
"Constant turnover robs programs of stability and direction,
as a parade of short-term faculty members with different academic
backgrounds alters course selection and contents. It also damages
the relationship between faculty members and students that is critical
to the quality of higher education.
"
"
The Faculty Work Project of the Associated New American
Colleges recently conducted a national study with support from the
Pew Charitable Trusts. The study found that faculty members work
an average of 53.6 hours a week, with 34 of these hours devoted
to student-connected activities (teaching, advising, and the like),
10 to research and 9 to institutional service."
"Indeed, the shoe is often on the other foot: it is often
not faculty members who fail in their obligations to their institutions,
but the institutions that fail in their responsibilities to the
faculty.
Managerial universities lacking in tenure do not
achieve excellence; instead, they condemn themselves to passivity
and susceptibility to fads. The direction of the managerial university
does not come from faculty who create their fields through independent
research and training of the next generation of scholars. On the
contrary, these universities must follow the trends set by the leading
universities, whose tenured faculty members perform this vital work."
"The weakening of tenure also threatens the quality of research.
Good research requires much time and some risk taking. Obsessive
checks on outcomes will favor small, safe projects with predictable
results over the daring, conceptually complex projects that have
produced cutting-edge research in many fields.
"
"Some people argue that tenure is unnecessary because courts
protect free speech.
Courts are often unfamiliar with the
academic world and may not make decisions appropriate to it. Further,
faculty who have been dismissed from one institution will hesitate
to pursue legal remedies that could jeopardize future job prospects,
and finally, the legal process is costly, time-consuming, and uncertain
in its outcome."
"To protect the traditional excellence of the American academic
system, faculty members must fight to preserve academic freedom,
the professional status of the faculty, and the faculty role in
university governance. Doing so means safeguarding tenure. The tenure
system is like democracy: it is not perfect, but it is light years
ahead of any alternative."
[Readers who are interested in this article are encouraged to read
the original paper in its entirety. Other summary notes on faculty
reward systems are available on the Internet at http://lohman.tamu.edu
under the heading "Summaries of Papers ..."]
Return to
the Lohman homepage |