Summary
Notes on Engineers and Ivory Towers, by H. Cross, McGraw-Hill,
NY, 1952. [Referred by Professor J. M. Roesset]
Summarized by J. M. Roesset, and J. T. P. Yao,
9/24/01
ON EDUCATION
The purpose of education is to prepare
a whole man to live a full life in a whole world.
In a
way, education is a rather simple matter.
But schools are
far from simple, and there lies the trouble.
"
The function of the universities
is to turn out intelligent men with some knowledge of practical
fields rather then to turn out non-intelligent men with detailed
knowledge of limited fields.
Education should give men
an opportunity
to develop freely their intelligence, to
think some things out themselves, to arrive at conclusions new
at least to them.
It may be accepted that some bad education
is worse than none and more bad education is worse than less.
To send people to college with too vague purposes simply
to learn standardized form of fragmentary knowledge is dangerous.
The purpose of education must be service and not self-promotion.
"
"Distinction must be made between education,
training and schooling
It is difficult to educate without
training and equally hard to train without to some extent educating.
But the two things are not the same.
Schooling is helpful
in the process of education.
"Does the engineering curriculum train for
leadership?
The university can take men of reasonable health,
ambition, character and intellect, and put them in an environment
in which they will learn something of leadership, of its realities
and its failures. Clearly all men cannot lead.
Science
and system, law and custom, men and manners. The universities
will not correlate these
but the universities
show
students that later they themselves must try this correlation
and that the sooner the start, the better.
"
It
is easier to teach rules than it is to train judgment; therefore,
when teachers get tired in the schools they are likely to revert
to rules.
Consequently college curricula
tend to
degenerate into compilations of rules, regulations, cases and
classes unless these curricula are constantly revitalized.
But the rules must be taught as well as judgment, and college
is a good place to teach many of the rules.
"
"
Some educators appear to think that
if the number of courses and classes available is increased, then
the training will be better and more valuable.
He who sets
up two courses where one grew before two often thinks of himself
as progressive and looks with
scorn on the reactionary who asks whether the
two courses could not just as well be combined.
Inflation
of the curriculum is not new.
Engineering in the undergraduate
curriculum is becoming pocketed in smaller and smaller pigeonholes
Some think this multiplication of courses is necessary for development
of the research attitude among the younger men of the staff and
among the undergraduates. Actually, all engineering is research
if by research is meant the solution of a problem not previously
encountered or the development of a new solution of an old problem.
"
Great buildings and expensive laboratories
can never make a great university: great teachers do.
ON TEACHING
"Teaching is an art.
As an art, teaching
is necessarily individual
It can be accomplished by lecture
or by discussion.
A teacher's first job is to teach, not
to write or to do conventional research or to make speeches or
to run errands on academic or technical committees, but to teach.
Do not misunderstand this
Not only must they be in contact
with technical societies but they must also follow the relations
those technical activities to other developments.
Scholarship?
Of course.
The great teacher must know his field, must
know it in a peculiarly clear and vivid way. Then he will not
only be a thinker, but an original thinker. Productivity? A teacher
constantly trying to master his field almost inevitably produces
The output will have value
because of its quality and not
because of its quantity.
Research?
Hard and intelligent
study of any field of knowledge inevitably leads to research
"
"How shall the teacher teach?
Some
of the most popular teachers are mighty poor ones; some of the
greatest teachers have not been generally loved.
Uniformity
of method is certainly the last thing to be desired.
There
are many kinds of teachers, many fields of thoughts.
"
A clear and simple restatement of a fundamental
principle may have profound influence. The virtue here is not
due to any novelty of the rewording, but rather due to the simplicity
and clarity of the contribution.
In the field of engineering
the known basic principles are not very numerous.
The difficulty
comes in applying them.
"There is much talk of 'research,' of 'original
contribution' and of the 'progress of science.'
These may
be experimental or analytical
they may be bibliographical
Many of the candidates for the doctorate have planned to go right
into teaching. This is almost certainly bad, for one who is to
become a teacher of engineering should be trained primarily to
be an engineer, and association with the profession outside of
the ivory towers of learning is absolutely essential."
The professor acts in part as a
catalyst
Alumni are much inclined to have educators carefully
prepares some part of this long road.
Thus a young graduate
of thirty often think that he should have had more technical details
in courses. At forty there is often the complaint that not enough
attention was given to law and management, at fifty the alumnus
wishes that he had studied more English or that he had read more
of classical literature, at sixty he is usually grown up enough
to recognize that colleges are dealing with young men of twenty
"
ON ENGINEERING
Engineers are not primarily scientists.
If they must be classified, they may be considered more humanists
than scientists. Those who devote their life to engineering are
likely to find themselves in contact with almost every phase of
human activity. Not only must they make important decisions about
the mere mechanical outline of structures and machines, but they
are also confronted with the problems of human reactions to environment
and are constantly involved in problems of law, economics and
sociology.
"
some types of planning, designing
and experimenting can be put on an assembly line and some types
can be put on an assembly line of skilled brains only, but much
of the most important work cannot be done by using fixed rules,
standardized formulas or rigid methods.
Machines, methods
and systems cannot be a substitute for men.
The assembly
line can never replace the brain that has created it.
"
Many engineering problems are as
closely allied to social problems as they are to pure science.
The workaday world does not fit into an academic department
or into so-called fields of learning.
In addition to necessary
classical interests engineers need character and culture and charm
Few men ever live life fully, but the opportunity and the birthright
are there for the engineer.
The work of the engineer deals
with human customs as well as material facts.
An important
duty of teachers is force students repeatedly back into the field
of reality
Some seniors forget that the laws of mechanics
make them fall and bump their heads
that energy may kill.
Good engineers have a vivid sense of reality.
Engineers
are primarily conscious of and intimately concerned with the consequences,
social and political, of the works they have in hand.
Another
important element of intellectual training is coordination of
analysis and synthesis.
"
"
Interpretation of the evidence is
always difficult, correct and gifted interpretation represents
the highest attainment of the scholar.
Not enough use is
made of the simple statement, 'I don't know.'
A brief and
clear summary maybe the crowning glory of a good engineering report
and good summary is very hard to write.
"
"Of course, there can be no discrepancy
between correct theory and good practice.
All theory is
limited in application.
Laboratory experiments may give
valuable evidence.
All these sources of evidence provide
needed information.
"
"Poor engineering entails failure and misfortune,
inconvenience, suffering and death.
Errors of judgment
will occur
For just this reason competent engineers
go back to test their conclusions by simple truths; for the great
principles of engineering are always simple
It is not important
whether engineering is called a craft, a profession or an art;
under any name this study of man's needs and of God's gifts that
they may be brought together is broad enough for a lifetime."
"
'One test is worth a dozen opinions'
Someone else has said that 'no test is worthy of credence
unless supported by an adequate theory.' Engineers can
see
and weigh the truth of these conflicting views.
Engineers
are always critical of statistical data and regularly ask whether
the indications of the data were not inherent in the method of
collection.
Engineers usually know what they are trying
to do.
Engineering is essentially a craft.
Varying
degrees of emphasis are given by different thinkers to the importance
of human affairs, of genesis, of analysis, of synthesis - the
reaction of new concepts, the analysis of known phenomena, or
the putting together of old things to make better things.
"
[Readers who are interested in this
book are encouraged to read the original version in its entirety.
Other summary notes on faculty reward systems are available on
the Internet at http://lohman.tamu.edu under the heading
"Summaries of Papers ..."]