|
The Future of Engineering Education: Part 1. A Vision for
a New Century, by A. Rugarcia, R. M. Felder, D. R. Woods,
J. E. Stice, Chemical Engineering Education, Winter 2000,
pp. 16-25. To read the complete paper click here:
http://www2.ncsu.edu/effective_teaching/)
Summarized by J. T. P. Yao, 6/25/00
"
Starting in 2001, Engineering Criteria 2000 will be
implemented as the standard for accreditation. Thereafter, all U.S.
engineering programs will have to demonstrate that besides having
a firm grasp of science, mathematics, and engineering fundamentals,
their graduates possess communication, multidisciplinary teamwork,
and lifelong learning skills and awareness of social and ethical
considerations associated with the engineering profession.
"
"Our goal in this paper and in the five that follow it is
to offer some tools to engineering professors who wish to become
better teachers and university administrators who wish to improve
the quality of teaching in their institutions. This paper attempts
to define in some detail the challenges currently facing engineering
education. The second article will survey teaching methods that
have repeatedly been shown to improve learning; the third will elaborate
on methods that help students develop critical skills; the fourth
will examine effective ways to prepare the professoriate to learn
and implement the new methods; the fifth will propose methods of
assessing and evaluating teaching effectiveness; and the sixth will
explore possible modifications in the university incentive-and-reward
structure that will enable the desired changes to occur on a systemic
level."
"
The Technological Personality of the 21st Century
- Information: Proliferating - In 1989, 10,000 volumes
were required just to list the titles of all the books that had
been published, and roughly 6,000 scientific articles were published
every day. The number of documents available has since tripled,
and there is every indication that the rate of growth will be
sustained, if not increased.
- Technical Development: Multidisciplinary -
The
situation now is much more complex: for example, engineers of
all types are finding themselves faced with a need to know electronics
and/or biochemistry.
- Markets: Globalized -
Succeeding internationally
requires cultural and economic understanding no less than technological
expertise.
- The Environment: Endangered -
1. Substances extracted
from the earth's crust (
) must not systematically accumulate
in the ecosphere.
2. Substances produced by society must
not systematically increase in the ecosphere.
3. The physical
conditions for productivity and assimilation within the ecosystem
cannot be systematically diminished.
4. Since resources
are limited, basic human needs must be met with the most resource-efficient
methods available.
- Social Responsibility: Emerging -
We have obligations
to inform ourselves and the rest of the population about the potential
social consequences of the decisions that are made, to judge whether
the implementation of decisions is consistent with the objective
of technology to improve our well-being for citizens of the world
(
) , and to take appropriate action or choose inaction,
depending on the outcome of the judgment.
- Corporate Structures: Participatory - Companies in different
societies are moving toward structures that allow for greater
participation of individuals in the decision-making process.
- Change: Rapid -
The education that succeeds will
be the one that facilitates lifelong learning, equipping students
with the skills they will need to adapt to change."
"Components of Engineering Education -
Knowledge -
No matter how many parallel tracks and
elective courses are offered, however, it will never be possible
to teach engineering students everything they will be required to
know when they go to work. A better solution may be to shift our
emphasis away from providing training in an ever-increasing number
of specialty areas to providing a core set of science and engineering
fundamentals, helping students integrate knowledge across courses
and disciplines, and equipping them with lifelong learning skills.
Skills - The skills required to address the challenges
to future engineers raised in the first section may be divided into
seven categories: (1) independent, interdependent, and life-long
learning skills; (2) problem solving, critical thinking, and creative
thinking skills; (3) interpersonal and teamwork skills; (4) communication
skills; (5) self-assessment skills; (6) integrative and global thinking
skills; and (7) change management skills.
Attitudes and Values -
Engineers often make decision
without feeling a need to take into account any of the social, ethical,
and moral consequences of these decisions, believing that those
considerations are in someone else's purview. By default, the decisions
have consequently become the exclusive province of economists and
politicians, who lack the ability to predict or evaluate their consequences.
"
"Obstacles to Change
A substantial number of engineering professors are still
unaware of alternative educational methods, and many who are aware
of them choose not to incorporate them into their approach to teaching.
Modern universities have
become totally dependent
on research funds to support most of their functions, including
educational and administrative functions only marginally related
to research.
In consequence, many young faculty members either
have little interest in doing high-quality teaching or would like
to do it but feel that they cannot afford to invest the necessary
time.
Another obstacle to change is the fear of loss of control.
Unless some training is provided and feedback given on initial
efforts, however, professors courageous enough to try the new teaching
methods are likely to become discouraged, give up, and revert to
straight lecturing.
The university administration must take
steps to establish a suitable climate for change before any significant
change can take place."
"Factors Supporting Change
In the United States, the new ABET criteria were developed
in response to these stimuli, and the knowledge that in a short
time they will be used to evaluate all engineering programs is substantially
increasing the pressure to change. Moreover, major support for educational
reform has come from the National Science Foundation Division of
Undergraduate Education and the NSF-sponsored Engineering Coalitions.
"
"The Critical Questions
Engineering Curricula and Courses
- What is the appropriate balance between 'fundamentals' and 'applications'?
- What steps can be taken to integrate class material across courses
and disciplines, so that engineering students become accustomed
to thinking along interdisciplinary lines in the approach to problem
solving?
- How should the development of critical skills
be facilitated
in the curriculum?
Teaching Methods
- What forms of in-class activities
have been found most
effective at increasing knowledge and critical skills and at promoting
and reinforcing positive professional attitudes?
- What is an appropriate balance between teacher-centered and
student-centered instruction? Between cooperative and individual
learning?
- How can students be motivated to be self-directed learners?
- How might we overcome faculty resistance to try something new
in the classroom?
Instructional Development
- What material should instructional development
programs
cover?
- Should the programs be mandatory or optional for faculty members?
- What do instructional development programs cost?
- How do the different types of programs (seminars, workshops,
courses) compare in effectiveness at improving teaching?
Faculty Hiring, Advancement, and Rewards
- Does the requirement that every engineering professor be a disciplinary
researcher to enjoy full departmental citizenship have a logical
basis?
- Who will teach engineering practice in the coming years as the
number of engineering professors with industrial experience continues
to shrink?
- Who will develop innovative and effective teaching methods in
the future, do the research to validate them, and help other faculty
members implement them?
- Is it possible to assure that every engineering department has
at least a few individuals who can perform the preceding tasks
with dedication and skills?
"
[Readers who are interested in this article are encouraged to read
the original paper in its entirety. Other summary notes on faculty
reward systems are available on the Internet at http://lohman.tamu.edu
under the heading "Summaries of Papers ..."]
Return to
the Lohman homepage |