Summary Notes on "The Future of Engineering Education: Part 4. Learning How to Teach," by J. E. Stice, R. M. Felder, D. R. Woods, A. Rugarcia, Chemical Engineering Education, Spring 2000, pp. 118-127. (The paper in its entirety is available on the Internet at http://www2.ncsu.edu/effective_teaching/) [55 references]

Summarized by J. T. P. Yao, 7/7/00

"… With rare exceptions, no one teaches college teachers to teach! They receive training as researchers, join faculties, and enter their classrooms without so much as five seconds of instruction on what to do there. …"

"Every skilled craft provides formal instruction and/or mentorship for its new practitioners … except college teaching, which expects its newcomers to learn everything themselves by trial-and-error. … Much of the knowledge and many of the skills college teachers need to be effective can be taught. … There are several reasons why such courses are not commonplace, their benefits notwithstanding. First, most faculty do not see a need for courses on teaching, believing that the knowledge and skills required to teach effectively can be just as well be picked up on the job. … In addition, many dissertation advisors actively discourage their graduate students from taking courses that are not required to pass the qualifying exams and take time away from research. Finally, most engineering faculty do not feel prepared by their own education or experience to teach courses on teaching. …"

"… In the first three papers in this series, we proposed viewing undergraduate education less as amassing of information and more as learning how to think, how to create, and how to develop the motivation and skill to be a lifelong learner and problem solver. In this paper, we argue that a graduate education should be viewed in a similar way. …"

"Workshops and seminars lasting anywhere from an hour to a week are far more common than academic courses as vehicles for teaching about teaching. These programs may be external to any campus (e.g., professional society conference workshops), campus-wide, engineering-specific, or departmental. …"

"In most skilled professions, novices are mentored by experienced practitioners who provide guidance and constructive feedback on the novices' initial efforts. This process can cut years off the learning curve normally required for unmentored novices to reach an acceptable level of effectiveness at a skilled profession. …"

"Felder described a mentoring program in the Chemical Engineering Department at North Carolina State University where each new faculty member is assigned a research mentor and a teaching mentor. The teaching mentor - who should be an excellent teacher with a desire to serve in that capacity - and the new professor co-teach a course in the latter's first semester. The mentor initially takes most of the responsibility for planning lectures, class activities, assignments, tests, and conducting classes; the mentee observes and takes notes; and the two discuss the class at a weekly debriefing meeting. As the semester progresses, the mentee gradually takes more responsibility for the instruction and the mentor becomes more of an observer, refraining from intervening in class if the mentee get into difficulty and troubleshooting the problem at the next debriefing. Next semester, the mentee teaches a course and mentor functions only as an occasional observer in class and consultant at periodic … debriefings. The mentor also makes an effort to introduce the mentee to faculty colleagues with related interests, both locally and at professional conferences. …"

"An important requirement for a mentorship program is for department heads and deans to recognize that effective mentoring takes a certain amount of skill and a great deal of time. Several hours of mentor training should be provided by campus instructional development staff or experienced mentors, and all mentors should be compensated in some manner for their efforts."

"The most common - and arguably the most effective - way for new members of a professional organization to learn the ropes and adapt to the local culture is informal networking with experienced colleagues. … It does not always happen, and it is least likely to happen to women and minority faculty in engineering, who may have the greatest need for such support. …"

"Analyzing a videotape of a lecture with the help of a teaching consultant is an effective (albeit sometime humbling) first step toward teaching improvement. … Before the class, make a list of six questions you have about your lecturing and write down your guesses at the answers. Have the class videotaped and ask the class members to complete a traditional student evaluation form. Complete the same form yourself twice - once based on how you felt the class went and once based on how you guess the students rated the experience. Then watch a replay of the videotape and analyze it in the context of your six questions. Compare the student evaluations with your two sets of responses and identify five strengths and two areas to work on. …"

"ASEE Prism is the news journal and The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) the research journal of the American Society for Engineering Education. … Other journals containing useful articles for college teachers include The Journal of College Science Teaching, College Teaching, Change, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, the AAHE Bulletin … A substantial and rapidly growing collection of resources for instructors can be found on World Wide Web (such as World Lecture Hall www.utexas.edu/world/lecture/index.html, National Engineering Education Delivery System www.needs.org, Resources in Engineering and Science Education (Richard Felder's Web site) <www2.ncsu.edu/effective_teaching>, Collaborative Learning Website <ww.wcer.wisc.edu/nice/cli/cl/clhome.asp> Deliberations on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education www.lgu.ac.uk/deliberations/, For Your Consideration www.unc.edu/depts/ctl/fyc.html, Links to a Better Education http://w3.nai.net/~bobsalsa/linkstoa.htm, …) …"

"Beginning in 2001, engineering departments seeking accreditation will have to show that they are equipping their graduates with a specified array of skills and that they have established a program to assess the level of these skills and remedy any deficiencies revealed by the assessment. … To implement these changes, most engineering professors will have to be educated in the new instructional methods, as opposed to the relative few who have been motivated to learn about them in the past. …"

"An essential component of a successful faculty development program is strong institutional support. An adequate budget is of course a necessary condition. Beyond that, academic administrators should convey a clear expectation that the faculty will be good teachers, good teaching will be rewarded in tangible ways, and inadequate teaching will be penalized. …"

"Few engineering schools explicitly prepare their graduate students to teach, and new professors consequently join faculties equipped with a Ph.D. in their discipline but no background in pedagogy. Also, most colleges and universities have few criteria to screen prospective candidates for their teaching ability; much of the emphasis in hiring is on perceived potential as a researcher. ... Teaching is a complex craft, but the skills required to do it effectively can be taught. … To recapitulate, we advocate a program that includes a subset of teaching improvement workshops, courses, seminars, mentorships and partnerships, learning communities and consultation with campus teaching experts. Graduate courses in college teaching should be provided for those students who think they might be interested in academic careers. The faculty development coordinator should maintain resources for self-study, including books, journals, multimedia resources and guides to useful Web sites. …"

[Readers who are interested in this article are encouraged to read the original paper in its entirety. Other summary notes on faculty reward systems are available on the Internet at http://lohman.tamu.edu under the heading "Summaries of Papers ..."]

Return to the Lohman homepage

© 2001 The Lohman Professorship all rights reserved. Last modified