Summary
Notes on Making the Most of College: Students Speak Their Minds,
by R. J. Light, Harvard University Press, 242 pages, 2001 [in
the packet of TAMU 2nd Assessment Conference, 12 February
2002]
Summarized by J. T. P. Yao (2/20/02)
"In this book I offer a synthesis of findings
form years of research on two broad questions. First, what choices
can students themselves make to get the most out of college? Second,
what are effective ways for faculty members and campus leaders
to translate good intentions into practice? For several years,
more than sixty faculty members from more than twenty colleges
and universities met regularly to design ways to answer such questions.
Strong findings are emerging and are beginning to influence
teaching, learning, advising, and residential life at Harvard
and at some other colleges.
More than sixteen hundred undergraduates have been interviewed
during this effort, many of them more than once. Some were interviewed
by faculty members: I myself interviewed four hundred. Other interviews
were conducted by undergraduates, who were carefully trained and
supervised by faculty members. Interviews ranged from one to three
hours."
"
When we asked students to think
of a specific, critical incident or moment that had changed them
profoundly, four-fifth of them chose a situation or event outside
of the classroom.
A large majority of students say they
learn significantly more in courses that are highly structured,
with relatively many quizzes and short assignments.
"
"I recently taught a seminar with seven
undergraduates. Each was committed to a future career in education.
Each student was taking the full undergraduate course-load.
Yet most of them also found time to volunteer in a public elementary
school in the area.
They believed that true self-esteem
comes from actually mastering something. The three nonwhite students
in the seminar argue this case with particular passion.
Children know when they have worked hard, and when they have learned
to do something well. That is what develops real self-confidence."
"Why is it that some undergraduates make
the transition from high school to college smoothly, while others
have much more trouble?
Sophomores who had made the most
successful transitions repeatedly bought up this word on their
own. Sophomores who had experienced difficulty hardly mentioned
the word, even when prompted. The critical word is time.
They mentioned time management,
and time allocation, and time as a scarce resource.
"
"A steadily increasing number of undergraduates
work in computing and technology. Many do this for their own learning,
separate from paid employment.
There is no significant
relationship between paid work and grades.
Two striking
findings pop up when students are asked to describe their satisfaction
with work experiences. First, on average, the more hours per week
a student works, the happier he or she is with work experience
as an integral part of college. Second, three-fourths of all working
students say that working has a positive effect on their overall
satisfaction with college. Only 6 percent think work has a negative
effect.
"
"
In any one semester, 25 percent
of all undergraduates are involved in volunteering. More than
65 percent of all students do volunteer work at some point during
college.
Students who work for money somehow find time
to do volunteer work more often than those who don't work for
money.
Why do students volunteer? They report that they
'enjoy helping others,' or they 'want to give something back,'
or they 'want to make the world a better place.' Of students now
volunteering, 96 percent plan to continue doing so in the future.
As with paid work and extracurricular activities, there is no
significant relationship between volunteering and grades. On average,
students who do volunteer work have slightly higher grades than
those who don't.
With the exception of intercollegiate athletics, no extra curricular activity is associated
with lower grades.
Students involved in some outside-of-classroom
activities are far happier with their college experience than
the few who are not involved."
"Why do some students perform significantly
less well than expected? Reflecting on three questions may help
students understand their own situation, and may help their advisors
know how to help them. First, are there certain problems that
are not unique to any one student, but that are shared by others
who are having academic trouble? Second, what can advisors do
to help students who are struggling? Third, what can the students
do to help themselves?
One symptom, a warning flag, is
that a student feels a sense of isolation from the rest of the
college community.
With a bit of effort, an advisor can
spot isolated students.
The second symptom is unwillingness
to seek help.
One source of trouble is poor management
of time.
A second source of trouble is that many students
who struggle continue to organize their work in college the same
way they did in high school.
A third source of trouble
for some students is their selection of courses.
A fourth
source of trouble is a particular study habit shared by almost
all students who are struggling academically: they always study
alone.
"
"Choosing courses each semester is a decision
that inevitably shapes a student's academic experience.
As students tell it, one-to-one supervised research courses are
the most intense of all academic experiences.
A small seminar
is usually organized in an entirely different way and for different
purpose.
Students describe each of these formats
as having its own advantages. They urge other undergraduates to
try to choose courses that will allow work in both formats.
As they begin each new course, what do students hope to get out
of it?
Two factors stand out in students' reports of how
small classes make an especially strong impact. First, such classes
enable a professor to get to know each student reasonably well.
Second, a professor can use certain teaching techniques that are
hard to implement in large classes."
"Of all skills students say they want to
strengthen, writing is mentioned three times more than any other.
When asked how they work on their writing, students who
improve the most describe an intense process. They work with a
professor, or with a writing teacher, or with a small study-group
of fellow students who meet regularly to critique one another's
writing.
The relationship between the amount of writing
for a course and students' level of engagement
is stronger
than the relationship between students' engagement and any other
course characteristic.
The seniors point out that writing
instruction helps most when students want it.
They believe they learn most effectively when writing instruction is organized around a substantive
discipline.
"
"Patricia Cross, now a professor emeritus
of higher education at the University of California at Berkeley,
suggested a simple and low-tech device called the one-minute paper
that addresses both the emphasis on the big picture and the need
for feedback.
Then ask each student to take out a sheet
of paper and write down, anonymously,
brief answers to two questions: 1. What is the big point, the
main idea that you learned in class today? 2. What is the main
unanswered question you leave class with today? What is the 'muddiest'
point? A box is placed near the door to the classroom, and students
drop their papers into the box as they leave.
It invites
student reflection and feedback.
To summarize, the one-minute
paper has many benefits.
1. It requires more active listening
from students. 2. It helps instructors identify students who need
special help or who lack adequate preparation for the course.
3. It improves and focuses students' writing.
4.
It helps document for students that they are indeed learning something
substantial in the course."
"The first perception is that most undergraduates are not interested to work in sciences when they first
arrive. This perception is wrong, at least on my campus and
probably on many others as well.
The second perception
is that students are frustrated by science faculty members' emphasis on research.
Several years ago, of sixty students asked about this directly,
only seven expressed this view. ... A follow-up examination of
this same question led to similar results.
The third perception
is that many undergraduates avoid classes in the physical
sciences because they worry they can't do the work
This
perception is half wrong.
The fourth perception is that
students who avoid science class have thought through their decisions
carefully and later are glad they made them. This perception
is partly wrong.
The fifth perception is that many
students avoid science classes because the workload is significantly
heavier than for classes in other fields. This perception
is in some measure correct.
The sixth perception is that
there is more grade competition
among students in the sciences than in other areas. This perception
is clearly correct.
"
"Good advising may be the single most underestimated
characteristics of a successful college experience.
Young
women and men arriving at college immediately confront a set of
decisions. Which courses to choose? What subject to specialize
in? What activities to join? How much to study? How to study?
Such decisions are intensely personal.
Advisors play a
critical role. They can ask a broad array of questions, and make
a few suggestions, that can affect students in a profound and
continuous way.
Step one is to encourage first year students,
on a voluntary basis, to track their time for more than a day
or two.
Step two is to sit and debrief with each student,
one to one, about what their time log shows.
A third step
is to follow up a few weeks after the debriefing, to see if each
student is actually implementing whatever insights and suggestions
emerged from going over the time logs.
There are enormous
numbers of opportunities for students to connect with potential
mentors.
All the suggestions so far for students seeking
good advising or mentoring have a common thread: each focuses
on the academic side of a student's life.
That advisors
should encourage students from their very first days on campus
to find a group to join. Step one is for each advisor to simply
make this recommendation to each advisee.
"
"
I have never forgotten those lessons.
For years I have asked my own new advisees to do exactly the same
thing.
And this one act - sharing a rough draft of a document
and asking my new, young advisee to mark it up so we can sit together
and discuss it - is what they remember and mention more than any
other.
They say it shaped their attitude toward writing
and their view of themselves as young professionals."
"... We asked graduating seniors this question:
'Can you think of any particular faculty member who has had a
particularly important impact on you?'
Of all students
who were asked this question, 89 percent quickly identified a
particular professor.
Only 8 percent of undergraduates
could not come up with a professor who had had a major impact
on them. ... The faculty members who had an especially big impact
are those who helped students make connections between a serious
curriculum
and the students' personal lives, values, and
experiences
"
"Research universities inevitably have some
large classes.
Some students express a wish for fewer large
courses.
How can students synthesize ideas and concepts
across disciplines? The interviews identify three ways. One is
to choose courses that are consciously designed to integrate.
A second option is to try to do it on their own.
A third
way is for faculty members to facilitate the process.
To
do this, a professor often creates a task that draws on the different
expertise and backgrounds of class members."
"Now, slightly over half of students on
most campuses are women, and nearly 25 percent of all undergraduates
across America are nonwhite.
Students from all ethnic and
racial backgrounds note that any discussion of diversity on campus
should be separated into two parts. One part is the question of
access.
The second
part is the question of educational
impact.
These are separable questions. The second one
is conditional, and depends upon the answer to the first.
Students stress that certain environment facilitate learning from
people with different backgrounds far more than others do.
Students point out that how well ethnic and racial diversity actually
enhances learning depends largely on how well a college builds
on
and proactively strengthens this basic assumption. They
say that if this assumption of certain shared values in undercut
by campus culture
then positive educational benefits may
not flow from diversity of ethnic and racial backgrounds. ..."
"
Nonwhite undergraduates in particular
report a troubling range of experiences in schools where 'making
it possible for students from different backgrounds to just get
along' became the primary objective. They believe this has catastrophic
consequences.
One result is that some white students and
their parents resent it. Another result is that nonwhite students
are just like white students, not pushed to excel.
They
find it ironic that such efforts
have led to both poorer
academic experiences and inter-ethnic hostility.
"
"The topic of ethnic and racial diversity
is a highly charged political issue on many campuses.
One
key theme is that diversity on campus exerts an impact on learning
both in and out of classes. A second theme is that interactions
among students often have powerful effects on people from many
different backgrounds.
A third theme is that while many
interactions are positive, some are clearly the opposite. About
two-thirds of the examples students give are strikingly positive.
Yet several tell of troubling encounters."
"Religious diversity plays a role in classroom
discussions and debates that can serve as a powerful educational
function.
First, if they are religious
they bring
a core set of beliefs and traditions.
In classes, such
students may interpret literary, historical, or cross-cultural
readiness in light of their religious upbringing.
When
religious ideas come up in class discussions, students often perceive
links between the discussions and their own beliefs personal lives.
The result is a blending that is delicate and occasionally even
risks offense.
Religious students face a genuine difficulty
when they think about connecting their personal religious beliefs
with academic work in classrooms.
"
"When preparing to ask about learning related
to students' different ethnic and racial backgrounds, I expected
to find that most 'academic' learning took place in classes and
most 'personal' learning happened in interactions outside of classes.
Student interviewers predicted that the interviews would confound
my expectations. They were right. Learning does not take place
in such a partitioned way.
For each student, the tone of
college life is set early. Much of that tone depends upon roommates,
neighbors, and dorm supervisors.
Living with students from
different backgrounds can actually change behavior. ... The key
point is that extensive contact, preferably both inside and outside
of class, is what allows students to benefit and learn from ethnic
differences on campus - and that residential arrangements can
foster this contact in a way that encourages such learning."
"
Students have no shortage of suggestions.
To learn from one another, students from different racial
or ethnic groups, must interact.
It is the college leadership's
insistence that activities on campus be inclusive.
Yet
a solid majority of the nonwhite students, and nearly all the
white students, report an evolution in the their feelings about
making it too easy for individuals in withdraw into the friendly
confines of a physical space where everyone else looks like them.
A second reason some students recommend a policy of inclusion
is that they believe such a policy sends a message it sets a tone.
Many students feel that diversity appears to be working
reasonably well on our campus.
A significant number give
the credit to campus culture builders
It happens when students
as well as campus leaders make a proactive effort to capitalize
on the opportunity diversity offers."
"Faculty members must assume a central role
in directing assessment projects and policy-oriented innovations
to improve teaching, advising, and student life.
I had
assumed that of course the answer would be yes. But gradually
I learned that many faculty members were concerned they might
become little more than research assistants for some one else.
Most faculty are busy, and most of the work of their professional
life has little to do with assessment.
"
"For our research, President Bok provided
support in two ways. First, he addressed on campus research and
assessment in his annual report of 1986, thus publicly giving
this work a high priority.
Second, Bok made a clear statement
by allocating seed money to the seminars.
It is clear in
retrospect that this funding emphasized high administrative priority
from the president's office from the outset.
A critical
message from our work is that such administrative action doesn't
do much to encourage steady and widespread improvement.
After all, developing new ways to teach that are demonstrably
better than existing practice is not easy.
By encouraging
both innovation and systematic assessment, any campus embarks
on a longer-term program of steady improvement.
Creating
such an environment can be a challenge. It is natural for most
faculty members
to highlight new courses or teaching methods
only when work well.
Faculty members and administrators
must agree to accept this possibility of two steps forward and
one step back. It can lead to a remarkable upsurge in efforts
to improve education for all students."
[Readers who are interested in this book are encouraged
to read the original version in its entirety. Other summary notes
on faculty reward systems are available on the Internet at http://lohman.tamu.edu under the heading
"Summaries of Papers ..."]