|
"The Changing Nature of Engineering," by R. P. Morgan,
P. P. Reid, and W. A. Wulf, ASEE PRISM, May-June 1998, pp.
13-17.
Summarized by J. T. P. Yao, 5/23/00
"
There are reasons to believe that today the changes
affecting engineering are accelerating at a rapid pace.
Initially
more of an art than a science, engineering emerged from the work
of inventors and entrepreneurs who paid little attention to the
scientific underpinnings of their technological activities. In the
early 20th century, engineering's scientific basis grew
in importance.
After World War II, several factors, including
the beginning of the Cold War and a postwar economic boom, heightened
U.S. demand for engineers and led to large increases in the number
of practicing engineers, engineering students, and engineering fields
and subfields. Graduate education also became more prominent at
this time, and the number of foreign students attending U.S. engineering
schools substantially increased."
"
Last October [1997], about 50 engineering leaders
from academe, industry, and government attended an NAE gathering
on this subject called the 'Workshop on the Changing Nature of Engineering
Practice.' The workshop discussions constitute much for this article's
basis."
"The ability to change rapidly is important to success in
industry.
As a result, engineers must 'relearn' their profession
on a more frequent basis than ever before, fueling the demand for
continuing education."
"Engineers need these expanded capabilities to cope with more
complex design demands. In place of limited design parameters set
primarily by material constraints, engineers now grapple with increasingly
complex, numerous, and 'fuzzy' design constraints - material, environmental,
and socio-political.
Consequently, engineers find it harder
to achieve optimal solutions, and must make more complex tradeoffs.
The possible downsides of information technology developments
also demand careful consideration. For example, there may be a tendency
to rely too much on computer-aided design and not enough on physical
testing."
"
Companies use more engineering and technical resources
today than ever before, thanks in part to the ubiquitous computer
and its electronic connections and networks. Hence, in the future
engineers in many disciplines will need to be increasingly knowledgeable
about information technology and computers."
"In the past 20 years or so, the U.S. economy has shifted
its focus from manufacturing to service industries, spurring a corresponding
shift in engineering employment.
These workforce changes
have created a demand for engineers who can fuse technical, managerial,
financial, and industrial skills."
"
In their bid to compete in this increasingly global
marketplace, companies must continuously improve their engineering
activities.
All these changes could have profound implications
for the engineering profession and engineering education.
The shift to a global marketplace does, however, raise several questions:
How can the United States increase it productivity so that it remains
competitive in such a marketplace? How important are engineering
wage differentials per location in selecting work sites? How can
we create a win-win situation for both developed and less developed
countries?"
"
R&D support is increasingly dependent on finding
a strategic vision or mission that is compatible with industrial
goals and objectives. This is a substantial change from the defense-based
environment in which engineers previously worked.
Increases
in industry R&D spending and federal R&D funding for health
and environmental concerns are not likely to offset the shortfall."
"The end of the Cold War and the shift away from defense work
have encouraged engineering faculty to pursue research of industrial
significance, some of it funded by industry. This research tends
to be more short-term and product- or process-oriented than work
funded primarily by the federal government.
"
"Once almost exclusively a white male profession, engineering
has begun to attract a diverse population.
According to 1993
data compiled by the National Science Foundation, Asians comprise
10 percent of all U.S. engineers; women, 10 percent; and underrepresented
minorities, 6 percent.
"
"Increasingly, new industries and enterprises are focusing
on the biological sciences.
Yet, until recently, engineers
played little role in the life sciences, and few engineering schools
required students to take biology courses.
Engineers and
physicians are collaborating successfully on medical breakthroughs;
schools are developing new biomedical engineering curricula.
"
"
To prepare students for these challenges, workshop
participants suggested that engineering schools broaden their curricula,
make engineering leadership a principal focus, increase their emphasis
on manufacturing engineering, stress comprehension over computation,
and strengthen their ties with industry.
We believe that
the following issues require further attention by the engineering
education community.
- University-Industry Communication/Interaction.
Although this increased industry involvement is desirable, universities
must retain their independence. They must refrain from becoming
too similar or too influenced by their industrial partners. Both
groups have different objectives and serve different constituencies.
- Change Technology. Engineering educators generally agree
that they should teach 'the fundamentals' as opposed to current
practices that can become obsolete.
It is time for engineering
schools to seriously rethink what students need. Topics such as
discrete mathematics, digital design, and bio-materials may be
becoming fundamental to an engineer's education.
Bioengineering
is not just biomedical engineering. All engineering may eventually
involve design with biological materials, processes, and techniques.
- The Curriculum Courseload Conundrum.
Some of
the topics that engineering schools are attempting to their curricula
are:
- Information technology and computing
- Life sciences
- Communications and teamwork skills
- Business and management
- Societal and political concerns
- Lifelong Learning.
A variety of lifelong learning
options exist, from self-education to formal degree programs delivered
remotely at company sites. No matter the form, lifelong learning
is essential for all engineers, and should take into account early,
mid-course, and later career needs.
- Information Technology. Engineering schools need to
think about information technology in two ways: 1) as an instructional
medium that can open new ways of learning; and 2) as a hot job
market for which schools should be preparing their students.
- Engineering and Society. Engineering education should
increase its attention to societal issues.
Additionally,
engineering schools should help their students understand the
societal role, implications, and limitations of technology, and
the importance of engineering input to public sector, public service,
and public policy deliberations.
Finally, engineering education
needs to contribute to the public's technological literacy by
expanding its role in educating nonengineering college students
and K-12 students."
[Readers who are interested in this article are encouraged to read
the original paper in its entirety. Other summary notes on faculty
reward systems are available on the Internet at http://lohman.tamu.edu
under the heading "Summaries of Papers ..."]
Return to
the Lohman homepage |