|
Summary Notes on "Use of Systems Analysis in Water Management,"
by P. P. Rogers and M. B. Fiering, Water Resources Research, Vol.
22, No. 9, August 1986, pp. 146S-158S. (Referred by R. A. Wurbs).
Summarized by James T. P. Yao on 4 January 2000
"Over the past 30 years systems analysis applied to the planning
and operation of water resources systems has grown from a mathematical
curiosity to a major specialty.
Based on the increasingly
large number of systems-oriented papers which appear in the civil
engineering literature, it is not unreasonable to expect that the
use of one or another optimization technique would have been undertaken
in a significant number of completed projects and described in the
literature; this turns out not to be the case. Moreover, U.S. federal
agencies and major consultants do not appear to use these techniques
in any but a handful of projects.
"
"There are many excellent journals in the water resources field,
but we concentrated on three deemed most likely to contain articles
on both theoretical and applied systems analysis. These journal
are Water Resources Research (WRR), the Journal of Water
Resources Planning and Management (JWRPM) of the American Society
of Civil Engineers, and the Journal of Hydrology (JH).
We examined all issues of WRR, from 1965 to the present, containing
a total of 2,582 papers.
But only 38 of 723 systems-oriented
papers prepared by U.S. authors, and even a smaller fraction of
non-U.S. papers, deal with identifiable water resources projects.
These account for about 5% of the systems papers, while the remaining
material offers models and related systems techniques other than
optimization for water resources planning.
There were no
published project plans or designs based on optimization procedures
in the last 4 years of JWRPM or the in the last 6 years of JH. The
ASCE and OWRT sponsored a workshop on reservoir systems operation.
The Proceedings
report (for United States) only two actual
application of optimization, both of which were single-purpose projects.
In one of the projects (Central Valley, California) the use of the
model was discontinued during a protracted drought, precisely under
those circumstances for which one would expect the greatest advantage
to be obtained."
"Perhaps part of the problem resides in space constraints imposed
by the several journals leading to a reluctance to publish project
details. We discussed this with leading consulting firms and found
little evidence that optimization analysis had been used.
Thus the principal publications in the water resources area do not
offer enough cases of system optimization to construct a meaningful
sample of studies from which we could draw reliable generalizations
concerning the stability of the systems approach to a given problem.
We classified all the principal (first) authors as being affiliated
with an academic institution, a government agency, or the private
sector.
The message is immediately evident: two thirds of
the model-oriented papers are written by academics, many of whom
have professional publishing objectives quite apart from merely
reporting successful applications of systems techniques. There are
good reasons for the apparent reluctance to publish such applied
studies, the principal ones being that academics are not often involved
as consultants on such projects or, if they are, proprietary interests
might preclude publication of the detailed results. Moreover, academics
perceive little professional advantage in publishing the application
of a well-known optimization algorithm in a given project. These
applications do not win the approbation of academic colleagues,
whereupon the stock of theoretical publications becomes ratcheted
upward while the detailed design results appear, if at all, in unpublished
memoranda which might never be consulted."
"If used to identify a range of acceptable options, and then to
examine these closely under stochastic influences, the technique
of systematic analysis have the potential of significantly improving
water resources planning and management.
Throughout this
essay we urge that the use of optimizing models be softened in favor
of systematic analysis.
We urge that creative uses be made
of optimization and that it not be used as an end in itself."
[Dr. Ralph A. Wurbs, an expert in water resources, commented that
"Their findings are basically that the numerous mathematical programming
(optimization) techniques published in the journals have had little
impact on the way the agencies and consulting firms do their work."]
Return to
the Lohman homepage |