Summary
Notes on "Does Size Matter?" by Carol A. Twigg, The
Learning MarketSpace, Written monthly by Bob Heterick and
Carol A. Twigg, Center for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 1 January 2001.
[To subscribe the electronic newsletter, send
an email message to listproc@lists.rpi.edu and type in the
body of the message "SUB LFORUM-L your name". To unsubscribe,
send an email message (with subject line left blank) to listproc@lists.rpi.edu. In the body of
the message, type SIGNOFF LFORUM-L]
Summarized by J. T. P. Yao (Called to my attention
by Professor Lee L. Lowery, Jr.), 1/4/01
"Awareness of the Pew Grant Program in Course
Redesign [for details see the website at http://www.center.rpi.edu]
is beginning to grow.
Because of the Program's focus on
large-enrollment introductory courses and because the majority
of grant awards thus far have been made to relatively large institutions,
many folks are under the impression that concepts and practices
employed by the program are applicable only to large institutions
and not to small ones, especially to small, residential liberal
arts colleges. Let me try to correct that misimpression and describe
the applicability of these redesign ideas to small institutions."
"The simple point here is that all institutions
have large courses, regardless of institutional size and regardless
of individual class size. Those large courses are the targets
of redesign because of their relatively large impact on the institutions,
again regardless of size."
"A second misconception about these redesigns
is that because they use technology, they are 'distance learning'
projects.
The reality is that only one of the twenty projects
funded thus far is a redesign of a distance-learning course; the
other 19 are on-campus efforts and all include a significant amount
of face-to-face contact. Again, the strategies employed in these
redesigns are unquestionably appropriate for residential students."
"A third point of misunderstanding is the
idea that technology is being used in these redesigns mainly to
improve communication within large
impersonal courses at
large, impersonal institutions.
While improving communication
is one aspect of many of the projects, their primary focus is
on improving student learning. And the principles that are being
employed to improve student learning are the same, whether at
a large university or a small, residential institutions."
"Does size matter? Perhaps in some things,
but when it comes to using technology to assist in improving student
learning, I don't think so."
[Readers who are interested in this article are
encouraged to read the original paper in its entirety. Other summary
notes on faculty reward systems are available on the Internet
at http://lohman.tamu.edu
under the heading "Summaries of Papers..."]